War (but mostly with Steve and Admiral)
My comments toward Steve are so hostile and lengthy that I'm putting them in code snippets so everyone else doesn't need to read them... just Steve.
@ Steve:
Quote: "I bet you $50. I honestly do."
Goooood. I'll accept paypal, Maximus_PT1@yahoo.com
Quote: "And you know what, you *are* a liberal, and a successful one at that. You do the trick about "I am a liberal, all you are to scared to face the facts that I am the only liberal on the forum". Honestly, it gets annoying to listen to constant jibberish from you."
I never EVER said that someone was too afraid "to face the fact that I'm the only liberal on the forum," because that would be stupid. As a liberal, I'm constantly going up against everyone else and being the only person defending the thing I'm defending... always. I [b]DID[/b] however say that people were too afraid to make this bet with me because they knew I was right. You say I write "constant jibberish," and yet your sentence made zero sense. Read what I say before you comment on what I've said, or don't talk.
Quote: "Your comment on Jeku was un-needed. You just blew it out of preportation."
That was an inside-joke directed at Jeku, and he obviously understood that, hence him not being angry about it or attacking what I said there. If anything, I hope it made him giggle a little. And I'm sure he got that, whereas for you, it *obviously* went over your head.
Quote: "Second, your "cunning" remarks on the polls and trying not to be political (even though you clearly were, and trying to be at that), had nothing to do with it, besides the fact it was about a poll. You truely dont know the outcome of a big poll, so dont try and act like you do."
Who said my remarks on polls were "cunning?" I was making a point Steve, and I think I pretty much made it clearly in a way that people (other than you apparently) could understand. And YES, it had EVERYTHING to do with a poll. Bush's approval rating is at 29%, but they don't count everyone's vote for that... they take them from focus groups. If they [i]did[/i] count everyone, the poll results would be DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out. I don't know the outcome of a big poll? What big poll? Please put at least an ounce of thought process into your comments before you open your mouth.
Quote: "Third, no, the 360's specs were patented and designed before the ps3's, but the ps3's were in a magizine first, big frickin woop, they are just trying to get more hype.."
Uh, go back and read that entire post again, because it obviously went completely over your head. And maybe wear a helmet while you're doing it, mmkay?
Quote: "Then on to halo 2 and 1, so what if it outsold it? The game is being ported to the 360 now, so boo-hoo sony fans just lost the big title that can outsell halo 2 (now 360 can have the version too, and if I know gamers, they will go for halo 3 AND gta console, more carnage...)"
They didn't when the PS2 had GTA and the XBox had both of the first two Halos AND GTA. Ugh, silly human.
Quote: "you are the one that are bragging around all that microsoft sucks, 360 sucks, xbox sucks, ect..."
How can someone "brag" that something "sucks?" Again, think before you post. I'm bragging that the Sony will win this round, yes, but bragging that the 360 sucks? Nope, that's physically impossible.
Quote: "Wow ps3 prices will go down in a few months to the same as the 360 current price?!? whats that jonny?!? 360 price is already going down because it has been out more months, and will be out even more when ps3 is released?! Really, and wii will be cheaper anyways?"
WHERE DID I SAY THAT? PLEASE, show me, with a QUOTE, PLEEEAAAASE. Man, I hate name-calling, but you're getting me teetering on the edge here Steve. I said that the PS3 will drop its price in a few months. That's it. I NEVER ONCE said it would drop to the same price as the 360 (although it will in a few years, I'm sure). And who cares if the Wii is going to be cheapest. Did it do anything marvelous for the Gamecube? No. Just because something's cheaper doesn't make it sell better. And DO NOT put words in my mouth.
Quote: "Historically?! Historically?!? wtf matt, when something is released first, it usually WINS."
Oh man, this is going to be SO MUCH FUN:
Quote: "Look at the Ford Model T!"
Which didn't have ANY competition and was LITERALLY the first mass-produced car in the world. When competition came around, numbers started dropping. And today, where's ford? Because they're not on the top-ten list of automakers... probably because their vehicles suck.
Quote: "Look at the bronze spear"
Do you mean the ancient battle device? The one that came around in the BRONZE ERA? They didn't have any other weapons back then genius. I'd take a Glock 9mm over a bronze spear any day of the week.
Quote: "look at the first PC's!"
What about them? The IBM's of yesteryear didn't have much competition either, and they weren't exactly top-selling machines I should mention. Home computers weren't a very successful industry until the mid-1990's, anywhere in the world. Shy of the movies "war games" and "Jumpin' Jack Flash" most people had never even SEEN a home computer back then. We did, because my dad worked at IBM, but most people just thought they were for geeks and losers.
Quote: "Look at Mac's!"
What about them? They're the ONLY company that makes Macintosh hardware... biiig surprise their number one in a field where they're their own competition. And how many PC's are sold to every Mac? Humor me.
Quote: "Look AT WINDOWS"
Uh, look at Windows' competition their smart guy, It's Linux, and that's it. God, you're using some horrendous examples.
Quote: "Look at popular beers! The first ones out make more money,
like the ones that started that crappy light beer craze, they won (it was a big company, like bud light I think)![/quote]
Again, a terrible example. I'm starting to question the existence of intelligent life in wherever it is you call home.
[quote]Using your own logic against you, PS2 was out before 360 and "according to you" it is winning...so explain these things to me.."
You can't use my own logic against me if you don't have the brain-power to understand said logic. Let me explain this to you as slowly and carefully as I can: In the last generation, everyone was excited about the Sega Dreamcast. It was released almost a full year before the Playstation, and everyone back then was saying the same crap you're saying now: The Playstation is dead-meat because the Dreamcast was out first. And where is the Dreamcast now? Either on Ebay or in your attic buried under grandma's underpants, why? Besides the fact that it was technically inferior, it was old and no one wanted to play with it anymore. Make sense yet?
Quote: "Matt got pwned, to say something in this thread"
You just earned a Carlos Mencia "duh duh-duh." How can you pwn someone when half of the time you didn't read what they said, OR make any sense when you commented?
Now on to the Admiral:
Quote: "Your basing your arguments on the ps2 mate this is a new generation and a clean slate and I bet you numbers will be a lot closer than the last generation."
My point is: History repeats itself. Every time a new Playstation comes out, everyone gangs up on it and claims it will lose. It hasn't yet, and it won't this time either.
Quote: "Id gladly take that bet in which the 360 will do better than you expect."
The bet I made is that the PS3 will outsell the 360 and drop in price. If you want to take that bet, then please, please name an amount.
Quote: "Also about the halo sales i bet microsoft made more money even if they got less sales which by the way is incorrect because halo made a worldwide record break with is grossing and sales"
I don't understand that. How can you make more money if you sold less units at the same price? And no, Halo did not break any sales records. Halo 2 is on the top-10 list, but that's as close as it gets to breaking any records.
Quote: "And the ps3 not more powerful sure the numbers are higher but the tech behind the 360 at a greater level so those lower numbers are actually more powerful"
Okay, this one you'll definitely need to clarify for me. If the numbers are lower, then how can it be "at a greater level?" How can lower numbers be more powerful than higher ones? I have a dual-core Vaio @ 3.0 GHz and my girlfriend's Dell has a Celeron at 2.53 GHz... but somehow my girlfriend's Dell is better than my Vaio? Please clarify this!
Quote: "Sony has been sweating they even said it themselves"
I'd love for you to attempt to prove this. Sony admit their worried? You're more likely to see Bush admit to being an idiot (THAT, Steve, was me being political, unlike before)
Quote: "Anyway you are a fan boy why else would you defend it so aggresively"
So what if I'm a fanboy? The only people who make the word "fanboy" an insult are xbox fans... bitter at losing all of the time has that effect I suppose
And lastly,
Quote: " have a strong suspicion the ps3 didn't even exist until after the 360 was released."
Again, not true. Plans for the Playstation 10 exist (not technical specs obviously, but on numerous occasions Sony has talked about the series going on forever and ever). The PS3 was unveiled
before the 360 and images of it were released before the 360's were. Again going back to game developer magazine, they had a full magazine devoted to the PS3 several months before the 360's full magazine was printed, and the 360 came out first, which should be a tribute to how long the PS3 has been in the works. I like Sony because they always think a few steps ahead... I'll bet they've probably already discussed the PS4, not publically, but are they planning on it? Totally.
I'm sorry for the outburst and the mega-super thread, but Steve REALLY got me riled up. I'm used to fighting one-sided battles... I do it in 60% of the threads I post in. But this was a debate until flaming started, and now it's on, so... (in a code snippet to make this shorter)
Steve, I suggest you either read what I wrote, don't put words in my mouth, and use complete intelligable sentence when you argue with me, or shut up and ignore me. I've never gotten this hostile with anyone on here before, probably because no one has ever been stupid to that caliber before. Even in my most heated arguements with Jeku, which have happened more than frequently, I've never turned to flaming and neither has he, and if anything I actually respect him more after a big arguement because of it. You steve are now my least-favorite person.
Anyway, here's the list of the top selling console games according to Game Developer Magazine, in a code snippet to try and shorten this post as much as possible:
1. Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas (PS2)
2. Super Mario Brothers 3 (NES)
3. Mario64 (N64)
4. Grand Theft Auto: Vice City (PS2)
5. Resident Evil 4 (GC)
6. Mariokart64 (N64)
7. Halo 2 (XB)
8. Final Fantasy VII (PS1)
9. Fable (XB)
10. Metal Gear: Solid (PS1)
"In an interstellar burst, I'm back to save the universe"