Sony CEO Wishes for Time Travel to Solve HighDef Format War
Just to add a bit to this btw
The latest Sales figures show that BluRay (80,000/month) currently has a 2:1 sales lead over HD-DVD (50,000/month) however something to note is that 6months ago this was different as BluRay (110,000/month) was beating HD-DVD (35,000/month) almost 3:1.
So ya know, sure BluRay is shifting more units currently; but interestingly those sales figures have dropped off since February and only increased to surpass HD-DVD when the PS3 was launched.
However the sharp decrease, (which I don't know the figures for this month as I couldn't find them) had the Sony CEO saying what he did in the link above.
What's more is currently there are roughly 12million HD-DVD Players purchased (only 3million of them are the Xbox 360 HD-DVD Player which btw works with Windows via USB, and doesn't require a DVD-Codec in Vista), now we compare this to the 7million BluRay players currently on the market (6million of them are Playstation 3's)
So given this, not only are there more HD-DVD Players on the market but also the sales of HD-DVD have been steadily increaseing world-wide.
Further to the point, here in the UK BluRay has been seeing some extremely poor sales since release. Unlike our American cousins, apartenly we prefer anything that can do the job just as good for cheaper.
If you check out the facts between the formats, there are many aspects (like picture-in-picture for interactive comentry, HDi standardised interaction format, manditory compliance to ALL major formats) that HD-DVD has over BluRay; with BluRay only really being able to boast size.
Which last week Toshiba released their Triple-Layer 51GB format for use, which is compatible with current players. Although Sony have created a 100GB Quad-Layer version of their format, it is only compatible with their new writer and Playstation 3.
Also while they can produce these larger discs, the costs are still slightly more than HD-DVD. What Sony aren't willing to do which HD-DVD companies are is take a loss on the format, given they're already taking one on the PS3 itself.
And yes, more space on BluRay with it built-in (25-100GB) compared to the 4-18GB normal DVDs support is great. That said games are getting more and more complex with much shorter gameplay time.
The ONLY title I've seen use BluRay yet for actually holding game data is Lair. Although you can say "well all of the PS3 games are using BluRay", this just isn't true.
Stranglehold (released later this month) only uses it for an attached film. Most of the games currently available use bog-standard DL DVD just like the PS2.
Quote: "Also, Zombie 20, take a look at the current prices for PS3's and 360s. I think your price argument has also been disproved now in my previous posts. I really can't be bothered to repeat it again."
Xbox 360:
Arcade - £200 (
Includes: 1 Wireless Controller, 256MB Memory Unit, Xbox LIVE Silver Membership, 1 Retail game and 5 Arcade games; UNO, Pac-Man Championship Edition, Feeding Frenzy, Luxor 2 and Boom Boom Rocket.)
Premium - £250 (
Includes: 1 Wireless Controller, Headset, 20GB HDD, Xbox LIVE Silver Membership and usually a game
Elite - £300 (
Includes: 1 Wireless Controller, Headset, 120GB HDD, Xbox LIVE Silver Membership and usually a game
Add £10 to any bundle for another full-title.
HD-DVD Drive is still £100, and additional 20GB HDD are £70
Games are £30-40 Retail
Playstation 3 60GB - £350 (Includes: 1 SIXAXIS Controller, 60GB HDD, PSN Account Key, PS2 Game Support, 2 Retail Games; One is always Motorstorm, normally second is Resistance)
Playstation 3 40GB - £300 (Includes: 1 SIXAXIS Controller, 40GB HDD, PSN Account Key, 1 Retail Game
The game bundles are only for Winter, as the 40GB model is normal price; the 60GB model is actually normally £415.
Games are £40-50 Retail
To me while the price of the games is acceptable, to me given the BluRay is said to be the most expensive component; rather than taking out PS2 compatibility and shrinking it by about an inch, why the hell not take out BluRay?
Another big issue I have is with the memory issues. While sure you can link up to 7 players at once (although only 4 are indicated on the controllers mind) on a single machine, if I want to take my save games to someone elses house.. I have a fiddly little SDFlash to do it with, or whatever the hell they're called.
Which to a degree is alright with me as I have a PSP as well, but what is irritating is I can't take my PSN account over to someone elses. I can sign in via the net if they have it mind, then again I guess it doesn't matter as much cause there aren't achie- :cough: I mean Tropheys yet. So it's only the save games that matter.. still just doesn't seem right with such a fiddly easily broken memory unit.
I've snapped one before by accidentally sitting on one, and I'm not exactly a heavy bloke. The 360 is just far more robust in terms of what you can physically do to it before it buggers up due to your own influence.
As for the "repair charges", they're free.. always have been and Microsoft are dedicated to keeping them so while the warrenty lasts. In-fact on top of them being free, they tend to send out free gear after a couple of time (plus a 1month free live gold account). I've yet to experience the three rings myself, however mine used to have a bad problem with if it was put on it's end doing something to discs like what the PS2 used to do.
What's annoying is this damage is considered "Your fault" by the game software retailers. Still they've solved that with the new dvd-roms and the three-rings are also something slowly phaseing out as more people get the new falcon chipset machines.
I seriously doubt IBMs ability to successfully mass-produce anything. Nintendo have Panasonic mass-producing their stuff, have done since GameCube. After Apple moved to Intel for their chips, would've thought Microsoft would've learnt, but no. Ho hum nevermind.
Still you want to compare the last gen to this in terms of price.
Cause I got my first Xbox for £250, and my second for £99 (yes retail).
I got my first PS2 for £500, and my second for £250, and my Slimline for £120.
I got my first GameCube for £150... I still have it. Didn't drop reading disks, didn't catch fire, still runs perfectly fine.
So if you want to sit there and claim price difference, I've actually spent FAR FAR more on Sony over the years than Microsoft.
If you want to get into the previous gen to that, I had the Greystation, Yarozee and PSOne. So yeah Sony really have done well off of me; and I bloody hate them.
So god know what they make off of you little worshippers.